An Ethereum user accidentally spent $9,300 in transaction fees to send just $120. They are now calling for miners to altruistically give the money back—although they are no requirements for them to do so.
A pseudonymous account known as “ProudBitcoiner” posted their experience on Reddit, posting a link to the transaction to verify it. The Ethereum user said they erroneously typed in the wrong transaction fee while trading—accidentally spending 23 Ethereum (ETH). Transaction fees are paid in “Gas” and numbered in “Gwei,” a system that can be unfamiliar and confusing to use.
The transaction fee was significantly higher than the payment. Image: Etherscan.
The transaction was made through MetaMask, a popular in-browser Ethereum wallet, while the user was using the Uniswap exchange to swap tokens. It was scooped up by mining firm Ethermine in under 30 seconds (miners tend to prioritise transactions with higher transaction fees).
“Metamask didn't populate the "Gas Limit" field with the correct amount in my previous transaction and that transaction failed, so I decided to change it manually in the next transaction (this one), but instead of typing 200000 in "Gas Limit" input field, I wrote it on the "Gas Price" input field, so I paid 200000 Gwei for this transaction and destroyed my life,” the user explained.
Fund transfers on the Ethereum network require a Gas fee to be inputted before any transaction. These are then paid to miners—entities who run powerful computing machines to keep a blockchain network running.
A Gas “limit” is the maximum amount of Gas that a user is willing to pay per transaction, while the Gas price is the amount of Gwei a user can spend on each unit of Gas. Together, the limit and price combine to set the fees per transaction on the Ethereum network and change continually based on network demand and activity. Hence the confusion.
For reference, data from tracking site ETH Gas Station shows that Ethereum fees are currently quoted at only around 24-33 Gwei per transaction, a fraction of what ProudBitcoiner ended up paying to Ethermine yesterday.
Meanwhile, the user is now trying to get some of the lost fees back. “I contacted Ethermine on Twitter, I contacted their CEO Peter Pratscher on Twitter, I made this post here … I am out of ideas,” they said in a post.
An Ethereum user has accidentally sent two transactions with excessively large transaction fees in the last day.
As Decrypt reported yesterday, the user paid $2.6 million in fees to send just $130 of Ethereum. A second, similar mistake happened in the last few hours. This time, the user was sending a greater amount of money, some $86,000, but still spent the same amount as a transaction fee—another $2.6 million. How could this have happened?
Someone just made a $2.6 million mistake on Ethereum
“...
Ethermine, on its part, has not yet responded to requests made by the Reddit user and are not obliged to. Any typos during crypto transactions are final in nature, and miners would only hand their earnings back if they want to do so.
Despite that, ProudBitcoiner is still not losing hope. “Ethermine, because they mined the block my transaction was part of and it's their goodwill if they want to return this or not,” they added.
The firm’s parent company, BitFly, faced a similar conundrum earlier this year when someone paid over $2.6 million in ETH as part of transaction fees in a block mined by Ethermine. However, BitFly pocketed the money after holding the funds for four days and stated any similar issues in the future will not be subject to any investigation or refund.
Also we would like to make clarify that in the future we will no longer interfere in the payout of large tx fees. Our advertised payout policy is to always distribute the full block reward and we will be sticking to that independent on the amount involved.
North Korean hackers are luring crypto professionals into elaborate fake job interviews designed to steal their data and deploy sophisticated malware on their devices.
A new Python-based remote access trojan called "PylangGhost," links malware to a North Korean-affiliated hacking collective called "Famous Chollima," also known as "Wagemole,” threat intelligence research firm Cisco Talos reported on Wednesday.
"Based on the advertised positions, it is clear that the Famous Chollima is broadly tar...
A previously unreported data breach has exposed more than 16 billion login credentials, making it one of the largest compilations of stolen personal data ever discovered.
First reported by Cybernews, the trove of data includes credentials for widely used services, including Facebook, Google, Telegram, and GitHub, as well as access to corporate, developer, and government websites.
Researchers from Cybernews said the information likely comes from a mix of infostealer malware logs, credential stuff...
Quantum computers weren’t expected to pose a threat to Bitcoin’s security anytime soon. But IBM has launched a project that could expedite the timeline: the world’s first fault-tolerant quantum computer, set to debut by 2029.
Despite their ability to calculate in multiple directions simultaneously, current-generation quantum computers have high error rates. Without fault tolerance, and the ability to detect and correct errors as they happen, quantum computers can’t run complex algorithms that wo...