A federal judge has ordered the copyright infringement case against AI image developers Stability AI, Midjourney, and the online art community DeviantART to move forward, according to court documents released Monday. The lawsuit—brought by attorneys for artists including Sarah Andersen, Kelly McKernan, and Karla Ortiz—alleges the developers used their work without permission to train their respective AI models.
According to court documents shared by the Hollywood Reporter, U.S. District Judge William Orrick, who has been overseeing the case, granted the dismissal of the claims of infringement under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DCMA) as well as the claim of “unjust enrichment.”
Judge Orrick did, however, allow the claims of copyright and trademark infringement, respectively, to move forward, denying the defendant's motion to dismiss.
"The court declined to dismiss some of the artists’ claims—that means those claims survive the pleading stage, and the artists live to fight another day,” IP litigator at the law firm of Knobbe Martens, Mark Lezama, told Decrypt. “But the artists didn’t have to address what may be their biggest hurdle: a fair use defense.”
Judge Dismisses Most Authors' Claims in AI Copyright Suit
A closely watched lawsuit brought against OpenAI by several authors—including Sarah Silverman, Paul Tremblay, Christopher Golden, and Richard Kadrey—had almost all of its allegations dismissed by a federal judge. Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin of the Northern District of California, in court documents filed Monday, dismissed the plaintiffs’ claims of “vicarious copyright infringement,” saying there was not enough evidence to support them. The ruling was first reported by Bloomberg Law. “Plaintiff...
Fair use refers to a legal principle under U.S. copyright law that allows limited use of copyrighted material without the need to obtain permission from the copyright holder.
“The court repeatedly emphasized that it would need to assess fair use on an evidentiary record. For the moment, that’s a victory for the artists, who get to unlock the doors to discovery and gather evidence to support their theories,” Lezama explained. “But the court also pointed out that the AI companies could test fair use on summary judgment.
“If the defendants are successful on summary judgment, the artists won’t see a jury,” he added.
Other artists participating in the lawsuit include Hawke Southworth, Grzegorz Rutkowski, Gregory Manchess, Gerald Brom, Jingna Zhang, Julia Kaye, and Adam Ellis. Video AI image generator Runway was also named in their legal filing.
Stability AI Gets New CEO, Restructuring Amid Turmoil
Stability AI, known for its image generation platform Stable Diffusion, will now be led by Prem Akkaraju as its new CEO, according to a Monday report from The Information. Akkaraju is the former CEO of visual effects company Weta Digital. Stability AI's founder and first CEO, Emad Mostaque, resigned in March to focus on his new startup Schelling AI. Chief Operating Officer Shan Shan Wong and Chief Technology Officer Christian Laforte had been running the company in the interim. This leadership c...
In October, Orrick dismissed most of the claims against AI generator Midjourney and DeviantArt, ruling that the plaintiffs had not provided enough evidence to support their claims of copyright infringement. Despite this, Orrick did allow a separate claim of infringement by Andersen against AI developer Stability AI, the creator of Stable Diffusion, to move forward.
Stability AI declined to comment on the case. Representatives for DeviantArt, Runway, and Midjourney did not immediately respond to a request for comment by Decrypt.
In November, Stability AI’s head of Audio, Ed Newton-Rex, quit the company over its justification for using copyrighted material.
“I’ve resigned from my role leading the Audio team at Stability AI, because I don’t agree with the company’s opinion that training generative AI models on copyrighted works is ‘fair use,’” Newton-Rex wrote on Twitter.
Edited by Ryan Ozawa.
