News broke this morning that PayPal, the company that kickstarted the online money transfer industry, will start allowing users to buy Bitcoin via its app and website.
Some have hailed the move as a decisive moment for Bitcoin adoption and cryptocurrency markets have responded favorably, with the price of BTC briefly hitting $13,000 today. But others think PayPal's forthcoming feature is a bad look for the world’s largest cryptocurrency, primarily because of what it lacks.
Digital payments behemoth PayPal will soon allow its customers to buy, hold and sell Bitcoin and several other cryptocurrencies directly via their accounts, the company announced today.
At launch, PayPal will allow purchases of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Bitcoin Cash and Litecoin.
Although users will be able to pay with cryptocurrencies at around 26 million merchants in early 2021, the resellers will still receive the funds in the form of fiat currencies such as the US Dollar, the company noted.
“The s...
PayPal’s new feature will allow users in the United States to buy, sell, and hold Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Ethereum, and Litecoin on its platform.
But there are a few things missing—for starters, private keys. While that’s something exchange users may not scoff at, they may be more troubled that “the crypto in your account cannot be transferred to other accounts on or off PayPal.” Which is something you would expect from an asset you supposedly own.
Blockstream CEO Adam Back and Kraken's Dan Held pointed out that PayPal could follow the lead of other platforms, such as eToro, and add withdrawal features after the fact.
However, for the moment PayPal's proposal is like Bitcoin without the Bitcoin.
Thus, according to Casa CTO Jameson Lopp, it’s not really crypto that PayPal is making available, but IOUs. In other words, and say it with me, not your keys, not your coins.
Never mind; they're only issuing IOUs. Wouldn't want folks withdrawing to a censorship resistant wallet, after all! https://t.co/21f0sQh5cX
SatoshiLabs, the creator of the Trezor hardware wallet, wasted no time telling people not to use PayPal for Bitcoin (which would, of course, cut into their core offering).
“When a household brand like PayPal starts selling Bitcoin, it’s probably not because they want to spur healthy adoption,” it said in a blog post.
It continued: “The only reasons to own Bitcoin which cannot be used would be to invest for the long term, which is incredibly reckless to do when your funds are held by a third party, or speculate on its price, which again, would be introducing the masses to financial mechanisms they do not understand.”
Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse admitted it was “great to see a payment pioneer leaning in,” but noted it was “disappointing [that] some fundamental tenets/benefits of crypto are spurned.” He then pivoted to a common refrain at Ripple, speculating that PayPal is remaining cautious because of crypto’s regulatory uncertainty within the US. (Ripple execs have publicly stated they are considering relocating the company outside the US.)
2 steps forward, 1 step back…Great to see a payment pioneer leaning in, BUT disappointing some fundamental tenets / benefits of crypto are spurned. I suspect PayPal is concerned about the (wait for it…) regulatory uncertainty, impacting its roll-out on a number of levels. https://t.co/aPVv85jrNR
If Garlinghouse is right, then one might reasonably expect PayPal’s cryptocurrency features to evolve and expand, as Back and Held apparently do. Indeed, next year, PayPal plans to allow users to actually use Bitcoin for payments, though merchants will receive dollars rather than BTC.
Regardless, these battle lines have been drawn before, and they’ll continue to divide cryptocurrency users. However, the question is: When more giants like PayPal get into the game (and perhaps drive the price up), how many people will stand with the cypherpunks on the other side?
Daily Debrief Newsletter
Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.
Solana network validators narrowly avoided catastrophe, rolling out a patch that killed a bug in a program that could have allowed exploiters to mint certain tokens in unlimited quantities—or withdraw them from any account.
The vulnerability, which would have only affected Token-22 confidential tokens, was found in the ZK ElGamal Proof program, which certifies encrypted balances and verifies the accuracy of zero-knowledge proofs.
“In the on-chain ZK ElGamal Proof program, some algebraic compon...
In a demo transaction, developers from smart contract operating system BitcoinOS (BOS) claim to have sent 1 BTC from a Bitcoin wallet to a Cardano wallet and back without relying on traditional bridge infrastructure, touting it as the first "bridgeless cross-chain transfer."
"Crypto users don't use BTC beyond the existing functionality," not because they value simplicity, but because "they don't have any other options," Edan Yago, co-founder and core contributor at BOS, told Decrypt.
Compared t...
Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has proposed replacing Ethereum's Virtual Machine (EVM) with RISC-V, aiming to boost the chain's performance while making it simpler in the process.
Buterin, in a May 3 blog post, claimed that through the proposed changes, Ethereum could "become close to as simple as Bitcoin" within five years.
"One of the best things about Bitcoin is how beautifully simple the protocol is," Buterin wrote, describing how Bitcoin transactions and proofs work.
Keeping the protoc...
