A user of the Ethereum blockchain just paid $2.6 million in transaction fees to send $130 of ETH. That's a fee of two million percent. This is the most anyone has ever paid to transfer an amount of Ethereum.
An Ethereum token on a keyboard. Image: Shutterstock.
The transaction, made just hours ago, included a transfer of 0.55 Ethereum to an address provided by cryptocurrency exchange Bithumb, while 10,668 Ethereum was provided as a fee to the miners. The transaction was mined by SparkPool, one of the largest Ethereum mining pools in current operation.
The $2.6 million transaction fee has since been sent to SparkPool's Ethereum address where it distributes funds to its wide array of miners. The mining fee hasn't been handed out yet.
We are further investigating the incident of unusually high tx fee, and you are welcome to provide clues to support@sparkpool.com. SparkPool has had the experience of handling similar issues properly. There will be a solution in the end. https://t.co/mZc49Q0Y4r
"We are further investigating the incident of unusually high tx fee, and you are welcome to provide clues to support@sparkpool.com. SparkPool has had the experience of handling similar issues properly. There will be a solution in the end," SparkPool tweeted.
There is little known about the person who sent the transaction, paying such a large fee. Previously their account has sent a number of payments to crypto exchange Bithumb, but that's about it.
Why did the transaction cost so much?
Ethereum users are in complete control of their transaction fees. They can choose how much they want to pay to have a transaction included in a block. The more they pay, the more likely their transaction will be processed quickly. But there's no reason to pay anything more than a few dollars.
There are a number of potential reasons why this excessive fee might have occurred. Arguably the simplest and most likely reason is that this unfortunate individual intended to send $2.6 million in ETH with $100 worth of fees, but accidentally switched the two fields. But there are a few puzzling factors.
For one, the transaction was added to the block first. Generally, transactions are added to blocks in order of their gas price, which would make sense in this case. But the other transactions in the block are not ordered by gas price. This could suggest that the transaction was created by someone at SparkPool and deliberately included in a block.
The Ethereum Name Service was designed to make sending and receiving crypto easier. You take your Ethereum (ETH) address—an alphanumeric string of characters, which shows how much ETH you have in your account—and replace it with a simple name. Much like how email addresses replaced clunky pieces of code, it was supposed to make crypto simpler.
But Decrypt has learned that this step forward in user design, has meant several steps backward when it comes to privacy. Since the Ethereum blockchain is...
The other strange factor is that the person who sent the transaction always used a gas price of 60 gwei for its other transactions. Except this time, it changed the gas price to 500 million gwei. This suggests that someone altered it for some unknown reason.
For perspective, current "high" gas prices are ~40 Gwei. This one payed 508,034,850 Gwei
Alex Svanevik, founder of data science DAO D5, told Decrypt, "Given the distribution of gas prices set by this wallet (every single outgoing transaction has a gas price of 60 gwei except this one), I'd say this must have been some manual intervention on an otherwise programmatically controlled wallet."
This isn't the first time SparkPool has mined an unusual transaction like this one. Back in 2019, Cointelegraph reported that the mining pool mined an Ethereum transaction with a $365,000 fee. After some communication between the unfortunate individual and the pool, Sparkpool agreed to return half of the fee. Will that happen again?
This article has been updated with tweets from SparkPool and Alex Manuskin.
Daily Debrief Newsletter
Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.
The Hyperliquid platform's native token, HYPE, is today the strongest performer among top 15 assets by market cap—excluding stablecoins. Its seven-day gains have outpaced major altcoins as Bitcoin volatility posts record lows for the year, pushing a relatively stable trading pattern.
HYPE traded at $41.31, down 0.3% on the day, yet maintaining strong momentum with 12.4% weekly gains and 67.2% monthly appreciation, according to data from CoinGecko. It has sustained this uptrend since mid-May, wit...
The investment firm of famed tech investor Cathie Wood remains bullish on Bitcoin as its price has climbed back near its recently established all-time high of $111,814.
Aggregate unrealized profit levels, Bitcoin ETF flows, and key support levels converging are among "bullish" indicators for the top crypto asset, according to ARK Invest’s monthly Bitcoin report for May.
“Bitcoin has not hit irrational exuberance,” reads one of the report’s key takeaways.
One notable sign that Bitcoin hype has...
Bitcoin Core developers have confirmed plans to remove long-standing data storage restrictions in the upcoming version 30 release, scheduled for October 30.
The change essentially eliminates Bitcoin's current 80-byte limit on OP_RETURN outputs, which are special transaction fields that allow users to embed arbitrary data on the blockchain. Under the new rule, transactions can include multiple OP_RETURN outputs, each potentially containing up to 4MB of data.
“Bitcoin Core is just one protocol imp...