The post-bitcoin bug reckoning continues. Developers have graciously divided the blame for the bug—which presented an opening for would-be hackers to crash the network and inflate bitcoin’s price—among themselves. Developer John Newberry, in a tweet, said he had seen the code but had assumed someone “smarter” had it covered. (They hadn’t.) Bitcoin “maintainer” Wladimir van […]
The post-bitcoin bug reckoning continues. Developers have graciously divided the blame for the bug—which presented an opening for would-be hackers to crash the network and inflate bitcoin’s price—among themselves. Developer John Newberry, in a tweet, said he had seen the code but had assumed someone “smarter” had it covered. (They hadn’t.) Bitcoin “maintainer” Wladimir van der Laan, meanwhile, tweeted that “the whole community screwed up by not reviewing consensus changes thoroughly enough.” (Which leaves the question—have they reviewed the recent patch thoroughly enough?)
As this happened, Matt Corallo, the developer who found the bug and helped patch it, continued to chastise the community for its rose-tinted retrospective on the bug’s successful, albeit two years late, apprehension. Some 87 percent of miners, he reminded followers, have yet to upgrade to the patch. (Though the Bitcoin team separately asserted that 50 percent already had.) Given that miners are so nakedly self-interested, we don’t really want to rely on their goodwill, do we?
This is what happens when people fetishise "decentralization" without considering what it's even there for. At this point, upgrade your own node -> problem solved for you. Who cares about Bob's long-forgotten Raspberry Pi node? https://t.co/DKbxyyuWPw
Goodwill, indeed, is hard to come by in this dog-eat-dog world. Consider this bizarre story. Derivatively named crypto wallet provider “Blockchain” is suing derivatively named crypto wallet provider “Blockchain.io” (formerly Paymium) for trademark infringement. Blockchain (the plaintiff) argues that the defendant is covertly piggybacking on its good name as a pre-ICO marketing ploy. Yet the plaintiff has chosen the two companies’ strikingly different logos, rather than, say, that they share exactly the same name, as the proof of this egregious impersonation. Crypto lawyer Stephen Palley called it an “odd argument.” TRUE.
There’s been another case of deliberately mistaken identity. Charlie Shrem, the founder of BitcoinFoundation.org, took to Twitter to decry a “scammer” using his name to falsely promise bitcoin donations to his real life friends and family. Mercifully, Shrem's friends clocked real quick that he would never do such a thing—one friend was “relieved” to discover that the source of Shrem’s newfound magnanimity was, in fact, a Twitter scambot.
Can the rich not just hoard their great wealth in peace anymore? Yes, they can. A Wall Street Journal investigation found that Jed McCaleb, the co-founder of international banking and crypto company Ripple (and subsequently Stellar following his departure) has been converting his hefty XRP stash at a rate upwards of “35 times” the limit agreed upon in the divorce lawsuit with his old firm. The stash rounds out at over five billion, making McCaleb very rich indeed. But there are fears McCaleb’s increased selloff will affect Ripple’s price, which has skyrocketed in recent days. Nevertheless, he insisted to the WSJ that “I’m not selling more than I have agreed to with Ripple.”
It makes you think. Can Ripple freeze his account if he goes out of line? In a word, yes. Since that’s the case, doesn’t that make crypto no better andmore centralized than fiat money, in that private companies can arbitrarily shut down users’ assets with no due process or legal intermediary? Eh, fundamental flaws schmundamentalschmlaws.
At least Walmart, for once, has a seemingly benevolent plan. The US retailer has decreed that all purveyors of lettuce, spinach, and “other greens,” sign up to its IBM-run “Hyperledger” (by January 2019), which traces products across their supply lines. This should overcome the chaos that took place earlier this year, when slapdash sourcing left thousands of Romaine lettuces contaminated with deadly E.coli bacteria.
Yet it’s easy enough to say “this lettuce is E.coli free and is registered on the blockchain.” It’s harder, however, to demonstrate any correlation between the blockchain’s version of the lettuce and the real deal, which may well be riddled with the bacteria and en route, finely shredded with a dollop of dressing, to a Pennsylvania soccer mom’s gaping maw.
You know who’ll sort it out? Leathery Old Man John McAfee. He’s decided — via a rambling tutorial on "bath salts" — to run for president, again. He’ll sort all this out. Maybe.
A tutorial on "Bath Salts" and the tragic situation of those who never got to try them: An expose into the mad mind and world of John McAfee. pic.twitter.com/9XhT7aUJ4N
Crypto sleuthing firm Chainalysis has added support for Crypto.com’s Cronos blockchain, its native coin CRO, and all CRC-20 tokens that trade on the Cronos chain to its Know Your Transaction service.
This marks the latest upgrade to the Chainalysis KYT service, which flags suspicious and high risk transactions for compliance teams at traditional and crypto financial institutions. The service counts Robinhood (HOOD), BNY Mellon (BK), PayPal (PYPL) and Genesis among its clients.
Cronos is an inte...
It's pretty well known that lots of crypto people have moved into Clubhouse, the hot, audio-based social media platform. The biggest group? Black Bitcoin Billionaires, which claims 17,000 members.
Now Square Inc., via its CashApp, is partnering with the group's organizer, Lamar Wilson, to create more Black millionaires through Bitcoin via “Operation: Satoshi Millionaire.” The month-long campaign began February 4 and focuses on getting Bitcoin into the hands of more Black families, and educating...
Welcome to the Daily Debrief, the tenth circle of hell.
Our stuff
Poyo no! There’s a scammer running amok on Augur. “Poyo,” a mysterious figure associated with a wad of defunct markets, has been exploiting the prediction market’s “invalidity rules,” in which funds staked on badly worded/constructed markets are redistributed evenly to bettors once the market is shuttered. By deliberately designing these markets to guarantee their failure, Poyo has been profiting off this redistribution of funds...